Pune: The final arguments in Nasrapur rape and murder case concluded on Saturday after an extensive hearing that lasted nearly five hours, with the court reserving the matter for judgment on June 25.The proceedings commenced at 11am and continued till around 4pm. During the hearing, special public prosecutor Ajay Misar advanced detailed submissions on behalf of the state, relying on CCTV footage, DNA profiling, medical evidence, forensic reports and witness testimonies to contend that the prosecution had established a complete chain of circumstances against the accused.The prosecuting counsel submitted that six CCTV footages form a crucial part of the evidence. Referring to the timestamps in the footage, Misar submitted that the victim was allegedly seen being taken towards the scene of the offence at around 3.12pm, while the accused was later captured returning alone at approximately 3.51pm. The prosecution argued that the material on record, including medical and forensic evidence, corroborated its version regarding the events that allegedly took place during this period.During the course of arguments, the prosecution placed before the court several supporting documents and analytical charts, including a comprehensive timeline chart, medical evidence analysis, forensic data chart, DNA profiling matrix and a connectivity chart. Detailed written notes of arguments, supported by relevant judicial precedents and landmark Supreme Court judgments, were also submitted to the court.Misar further relied on statements of key witnesses, including a child witness, as well as spot panchanamas, identification proceedings, seized articles and chemical analysis reports. The prosecution maintained that the chain of custody of the evidence remained intact throughout the investigation and trial.The defence also concluded its arguments on Saturday. While challenging the prosecution’s case, the defence sought to raise doubts regarding the evidence relied upon by the state.With arguments from both sides now complete, the court has reserved the matter for judgment. The verdict in the case is scheduled to be pronounced on June 25, bringing the trial into its final stage after weeks of evidence and arguments before the court.
